Which foundation repair method fits each cause of movement?
In short: Foundation movement has many causes, and each repair method only works on some of them. This table matches 26 causes, called mechanisms, to the methods that address them directly, the methods that support the main repair, and the methods that do not fit. The key split is between settlement, which piers can hold up, and heave or water problems, which piers cannot fix.
How do you read the table?
- Primary: the method acts on the cause or carries the load the cause has taken away.
- Supporting: the method helps, protects the main repair, or controls part of the cause, but is not enough alone.
- Not suitable: the method works against the cause, cannot act on it, or treats a symptom while the cause continues.
"Piers" below means underpinning such as steel push piers, helical piers, pressed concrete piles and drilled piers. Each method has its own page; the decision factors between pier types are in the method selection matrix.
What is the physical logic behind the table?
- Settlement vs. heave: swelling clay lifts lightly loaded foundations, and corners tend to rise relative to the center of a slab 1. Piers push up from below, so they suit settlement but cannot pull a heaved area down.
- Depth: piers work against seasonal clay movement only when they reach below the zone of seasonal moisture change and are anchored against uplift 2; that zone can range from 3 to 40 ft deep 1.
- Water: the code requires grade to fall at least 6 in within 10 ft of the foundation 3, and lawn watering, leaking pipes and pools create damaging moisture differences 1. An engineering analysis compared how a slab moves and bends with and without a water line leak beneath it 8.
- Soil treatment: lime cut swell about 95% at 3% in one Oklahoma soil and raised it 1,237% in a high-sulfate soil 4, because of ettringite formation 5.
- Crawl spaces: moisture is controlled by ground cover, ventilation or conditioning, and drainage under the code's crawl space rules 6.
- Basement walls: the code designs walls for sideways soil pressure, with the highest design values for the clay soil classes it lists 7; soil treatment does not reinforce a wall.
Which methods fit which causes?
| Mechanism | Primary | Supporting | Not suitable |
|---|---|---|---|
| Perimeter drying settlement | Steel push piers, helical piers | Pressed concrete, drilled piers, soil stabilization, drainage, moisture control, monitoring | Slab lifting by injection |
| Perimeter wetting heave | Drainage, monitoring | Soil stabilization, moisture control | Steel push piers, slab lifting |
| Center heave | Leak repair, monitoring | Steel push piers (raise low perimeter), soil stabilization, drainage, cosmetic repair | Interior piers, slab lifting |
| Leak-induced heave | Leak repair, monitoring | Cosmetic repair after movement stops | Slab lifting |
| Tree-root drying settlement | Steel push piers, helical piers, moisture control | Pressed concrete, monitoring, tree management | |
| Post-tree-removal heave | Monitoring | Soil stabilization, drainage | Steel push piers |
| Fill consolidation | Steel push piers, helical piers | Drilled piers, interior piers, slab lifting, void grouting | Pressed concrete |
| Soft soil consolidation | Steel push piers, helical piers | Drilled piers | |
| Hydrocollapse | Steel push piers, helical piers, leak repair | Void grouting, drainage | |
| Erosion and washout voids | Slab lifting, void grouting, drainage, leak repair | Slope and erosion work | |
| Slope creep | Helical piers, slope stabilization | Steel push piers, drainage | |
| Frost heave | Helical piers | Slab lifting, drainage | |
| Karst and sinkholes | Void grouting, drainage | Steel push piers, drilled piers | |
| Earthquake shaking | Cosmetic repair | Monitoring | Steel push piers |
| Wall pressure (lateral earth, swell, water) | Basement wall repair, drainage | Soil stabilization | |
| Crawl moisture and wood decay | Crawl repair, encapsulation, drainage | ||
| Crawl support and framing failure | Crawl repair | Helical piers, encapsulation | |
| Original construction deficiency | Steel push piers, helical piers, replacement | ||
| Post-tension tendon failure | Monitoring, replacement | ||
| Concentrated load settlement | Steel push piers, helical piers | ||
| Movement at additions | Steel push piers, helical piers | Monitoring | |
| Pier uplift after repair | Helical piers, drilled piers | Steel push piers, soil stabilization, drainage | |
| Over-lift heave after drought lift | Monitoring | Steel push piers, crawl repair, drainage | |
| Truss uplift (mimic) | Cosmetic repair | Steel push piers | |
| Material shrinkage (mimic) | Cosmetic repair | Steel push piers | |
| Vibration cracking (rare) | Cosmetic repair | Monitoring |
A mimic is a crack pattern that looks like foundation movement but comes from something else, such as roof framing or concrete shrinkage; see cosmetic repair only. Whether a house is settling or heaving is worked out in heave vs settlement.
Related
- Method Selection Matrix
- Heave vs Settlement
- Symptom Matrix
- Drainage Solutions
- Chemical Soil Stabilization
- Monitoring Program
Common questions
Why does the cause of movement decide the repair method?
Different causes move a foundation in different directions. Piers hold up settling foundations, but they cannot pull down a foundation lifted by swelling clay, and they do nothing about a water source or a plumbing leak.
Are piers the right repair for every foundation problem?
No. Piers are a primary method for settlement, but heave, leaks, crawl space moisture and basement wall pressure are addressed with other methods such as drainage, leak repair, moisture control and wall repair.
What does a supporting method mean in this table?
A supporting method helps control the cause or protect the main repair but is not enough on its own, such as drainage alongside perimeter piers on clay that dries and shrinks.
Why is lime stabilization marked with caution in sulfate soils?
Oklahoma highway research found that lime added to a high-sulfate soil formed ettringite and increased swell by more than 1,200 percent, so sulfate testing comes before lime treatment.
Sources
- Damage to Foundations from Expansive Soils Missouri University of Science and Technology (J. David Rogers, Robert Olshansky, Robert B. Rogers)
- Home Construction on Shrinking and Swelling Soils (Special Publication 11) Colorado Geological Survey (Holtz and Hart, 1978)
- Foundation Fundamentals: Inspecting Load Paths and Water Paths (IRC R401.2 & R401.3) InterNACHI
- Engineering Properties of Stabilized Subgrade Soils for Implementation of the AASHTO 2002 Pavement Design Guide (FHWA-OK-08-10) Oklahoma Department of Transportation (Solanki, Khoury and Zaman, University of Oklahoma)
- Calcium-Based Stabilizer Induced Heave in Oklahoma Sulfate-Bearing Soils (FHWA-OK-11-03) Oklahoma Department of Transportation (Cerato, Miller, Elwood-Madden, Adams and Varnier)
- Inspecting Under-Floor Crawl Spaces: A Guide for Home Inspectors (2024 IRC Section R408) InterNACHI
- 2007/2008 Proposed Changes to the International Residential Code (RB101–RB143) International Code Council
- Investigation of a leaking water line beneath residential foundation on expansive soils American Society of Civil Engineers, Geotechnical Special Publication 147 (Michigan Technological University Digital Commons)
Was this page helpful?
Thanks. Your note goes straight to the person who maintains this library.